June 18, 2026

EP 063 The Panda Disinformation Campaign | Cultural Conditioning Through Cuteness

Narrative control through cuteness: Tracy reveals how the giant panda was engineered as Cold War soft diplomacy, weaponizing our compassion to normalize relations with China. From WWF's suspicious 1961 founding to million-dollar loan agreements, discover how manufactured emotional investment in animals makes citizens complicit in geopolitical manipulation—a masterclass in cultural conditioning without consent. What else are we loving into compliance? https://SomeUnapprovedThinking.com Sponsor - https://DarkHorseEntrepreneur.com Tracy explores how the giant panda was deliberately engineered as a soft diplomacy tool to normalize Western relations with China during the Cold War. From the WWF's suspicious 1961 founding to China's million-dollar panda loan agreements, he reveals how manufactured emotional investment in an animal weaponizes compassion against critical thinking, making citizens complicit in geopolitical manipulation through the simple act of loving something adorable.

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon

Narrative control through cuteness: Tracy reveals how the giant panda was engineered as Cold War soft diplomacy, weaponizing our compassion to normalize relations with China. From WWF's suspicious 1961 founding to million-dollar loan agreements, discover how manufactured emotional investment in animals makes citizens complicit in geopolitical manipulation—a masterclass in cultural conditioning without consent. What else are we loving into compliance? https://SomeUnapprovedThinking.com Sponsor - https://DarkHorseEntrepreneur.com Tracy explores how the giant panda was deliberately engineered as a soft diplomacy tool to normalize Western relations with China during the Cold War. From the WWF's suspicious 1961 founding to China's million-dollar panda loan agreements, he reveals how manufactured emotional investment in an animal weaponizes compassion against critical thinking, making citizens complicit in geopolitical manipulation through the simple act of loving something adorable.

1
00:00:00,206 --> 00:00:04,296
Beneath the headlines, behind
the timelines, there is a

2
00:00:04,296 --> 00:00:06,086
story no one wants you to find.

3
00:00:06,546 --> 00:00:12,956
Welcome to some unapproved thinking, where
forgotten truths, buried patterns, and

4
00:00:12,956 --> 00:00:15,716
invisible systems rise to the surface.

5
00:00:16,135 --> 00:00:17,315
You weren't crazy.

6
00:00:17,765 --> 00:00:18,825
You were just early.

7
00:00:19,376 --> 00:00:20,065
Let's begin.

8
00:00:20,415 --> 00:00:23,605
You know, it's funny how we often take
certain narratives for granted, like

9
00:00:23,605 --> 00:00:27,436
the story of pandas being these cute,
cuddly creatures we just wanna save

10
00:00:28,555 --> 00:00:32,156
You know, the typical save the pandas
campaign that we always hear about.

11
00:00:32,515 --> 00:00:36,096
But like most things that seem
straightforward, there's often more

12
00:00:36,096 --> 00:00:41,288
to the story Today, we're diving
deep into what I like to call the

13
00:00:41,288 --> 00:00:43,658
panda disinformation campaign.

14
00:00:45,428 --> 00:00:52,138
You were taught that pandas are
cute, endangered, naturally occurring

15
00:00:52,138 --> 00:00:54,898
creatures that accidentally became icons.

16
00:00:55,287 --> 00:00:57,388
That's the story they
wanted you to believe.

17
00:00:57,687 --> 00:01:02,288
But the real history of the panda, the
deliberate construction of panda diplomacy

18
00:01:02,308 --> 00:01:06,938
as a geopolitical weapon, has been
buried so deep that even most conspiracy

19
00:01:06,938 --> 00:01:09,018
researchers don't know where to look.

20
00:01:09,277 --> 00:01:14,038
And once you see what actually happened,
you'll understand why governments still

21
00:01:14,038 --> 00:01:15,977
control the panda narrative today.

22
00:01:17,138 --> 00:01:20,627
This is Some Unapproved Thinking.

23
00:01:21,367 --> 00:01:25,148
Thank you to our sponsor, The
Dark Horse Entrepreneur Podcast.

24
00:01:25,807 --> 00:01:30,587
Unlock your potential with The Dark
Horse Entrepreneur AI Escape Plan, the

25
00:01:30,588 --> 00:01:35,077
podcast empowering hardworking parents
to break free from the nine-to-five

26
00:01:35,077 --> 00:01:37,297
grind through AI-powered side hustles.

27
00:01:37,807 --> 00:01:40,487
Check them out at
darkhorseentrepreneur.com.

28
00:01:41,057 --> 00:01:41,978
Now back to the show.

29
00:01:42,437 --> 00:01:49,788
In 1961, the World Wildlife Fund needed
a logo, a symbol of global unity,

30
00:01:50,107 --> 00:01:52,338
something that would transcend politics.

31
00:01:52,687 --> 00:01:54,028
They chose the giant panda.

32
00:01:54,028 --> 00:01:57,437
Specifically, they based
the logo on Chi Chi, a panda

33
00:01:57,448 --> 00:01:59,037
living at London Zoo that year.

34
00:01:59,367 --> 00:02:02,177
But here's what they didn't tell
you: that choice wasn't random.

35
00:02:02,887 --> 00:02:04,048
It was calculated.

36
00:02:04,378 --> 00:02:05,667
It was orchestrated.

37
00:02:05,917 --> 00:02:09,607
The panda wasn't selected because
of its endangered status or

38
00:02:09,628 --> 00:02:11,377
its biological significance.

39
00:02:11,787 --> 00:02:16,397
It was selected because of where pandas
lived and who controlled that territory,

40
00:02:16,647 --> 00:02:22,727
the bamboo forests of Sichuan, Shaanxi,
and Gansu provinces in mainland China.

41
00:02:23,027 --> 00:02:27,157
The panda became the perfect cover
story for something far larger.

42
00:02:27,437 --> 00:02:33,848
China in the 1950s and '60s was isolated,
economically fragile, diplomatically

43
00:02:33,848 --> 00:02:36,247
radioactive after the Korean War.

44
00:02:36,627 --> 00:02:42,127
The West had no direct access to Chinese
markets, no foothold, no leverage.

45
00:02:42,317 --> 00:02:43,057
But they needed one.

46
00:02:43,427 --> 00:02:45,557
They were losing the Cold War in the East.

47
00:02:45,887 --> 00:02:47,667
The Soviets were gaining influence.

48
00:02:48,068 --> 00:02:51,877
And then someone, and we may never know
exactly who, in the State Department

49
00:02:51,878 --> 00:02:55,397
or the intelligence community first
proposed this, realized something crucial.

50
00:02:55,988 --> 00:02:58,558
If you could make the world fall
in love with something that only

51
00:02:58,558 --> 00:03:01,907
exists in China, you could make
the world negotiate with China.

52
00:03:02,417 --> 00:03:05,957
You could make governments care about
China's relationship with the West.

53
00:03:06,318 --> 00:03:10,677
You could, in essence, manufacture
consent for diplomatic engagement

54
00:03:10,878 --> 00:03:12,587
without it looking like capitulation.

55
00:03:13,507 --> 00:03:15,147
That's when the panda narrative began.

56
00:03:16,078 --> 00:03:20,138
The World Wildlife Fund was founded in
nineteen sixty-one, and immediately,

57
00:03:20,748 --> 00:03:23,938
and I mean immediately, they made
the giant panda their symbol.

58
00:03:24,177 --> 00:03:28,797
Not the African elephant, not the
Bengal tiger, not even the Arabian oryx.

59
00:03:29,297 --> 00:03:33,607
Nope, they chose the animal that
lived in the one place the West was

60
00:03:33,607 --> 00:03:36,387
trying to penetrate, mainland China.

61
00:03:36,967 --> 00:03:39,007
The timing is not coincidence.

62
00:03:39,217 --> 00:03:40,537
This is coordination.

63
00:03:40,808 --> 00:03:44,997
The panda became the Trojan
horse of soft diplomacy.

64
00:03:45,347 --> 00:03:50,987
Every conservation effort, every breeding
program, every celebrity sighting,

65
00:03:51,227 --> 00:03:56,567
it all functioned as a mechanism to
normalize relations with a country

66
00:03:56,738 --> 00:04:01,078
the American government had been
trying to destabilize for a decade.

67
00:04:01,467 --> 00:04:03,977
The panda was the face of that reversal.

68
00:04:04,287 --> 00:04:07,487
The panda made it, mm, acceptable.

69
00:04:08,367 --> 00:04:11,628
But there's a deeper layer, and
this is where most people stop

70
00:04:11,628 --> 00:04:13,818
thinking because it seems too absurd.

71
00:04:14,488 --> 00:04:17,447
The panda itself may not
be what we think it is.

72
00:04:18,348 --> 00:04:21,998
Western scientists didn't have
sustained access to living pandas

73
00:04:22,167 --> 00:04:23,727
until the nineteen sixties.

74
00:04:24,017 --> 00:04:27,257
Before that, all accounts came from
Chinese sources, from scattered reports

75
00:04:27,258 --> 00:04:30,027
by explorers, from colonial era anecdotes.

76
00:04:30,637 --> 00:04:34,377
No Western naturalist had conducted
a comprehensive biological study

77
00:04:34,527 --> 00:04:36,247
of the panda in its native habitat.

78
00:04:36,487 --> 00:04:40,297
No one had verified its breeding
patterns, its actual population

79
00:04:40,298 --> 00:04:42,088
numbers, its genetic markers.

80
00:04:42,347 --> 00:04:47,088
It simply existed in Western
consciousness as a rumor, a legend,

81
00:04:47,728 --> 00:04:52,327
a creature from the Chinese interior
that was so rare, so elusive that

82
00:04:52,328 --> 00:04:54,427
hardly anyone had ever seen one.

83
00:04:54,767 --> 00:05:00,808
And then suddenly, as soon as the
geopolitical incentive aligned, pandas

84
00:05:01,027 --> 00:05:09,738
became available for study, for export,
for display in Western zoos, for the whole

85
00:05:09,747 --> 00:05:14,330
world to fall in love with Coincidence?

86
00:05:15,260 --> 00:05:16,420
Consider what happened next.

87
00:05:16,620 --> 00:05:20,930
China begins gifting pandas to select
Western nations as diplomatic gestures.

88
00:05:21,500 --> 00:05:25,769
By the nineteen seventies, following the
famous ping pong diplomacy that cracked

89
00:05:25,769 --> 00:05:30,910
open US-China relations, the panda gifts
shifted decisively toward Western allies.

90
00:05:31,269 --> 00:05:36,949
Premier Zhou Enlai presented Ling-Ling
and Hsing-Hsing to the United States

91
00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:39,489
after Nixon's nineteen seventy-two visit.

92
00:05:39,939 --> 00:05:43,519
Japan, America's ally, received pandas.

93
00:05:43,979 --> 00:05:47,269
Nations in China's diplomatic
favor received pandas.

94
00:05:47,609 --> 00:05:48,979
This is not conservation.

95
00:05:49,300 --> 00:05:50,499
This is currency.

96
00:05:50,870 --> 00:05:54,979
The panda becomes a token of
favor, a symbol that you have a

97
00:05:54,980 --> 00:05:56,909
special relationship with China.

98
00:05:57,289 --> 00:06:02,059
Every zoo that housed a panda, places
like the Smithsonian National Zoo in

99
00:06:02,059 --> 00:06:07,949
Washington, was essentially flying
a flag that said, "We have access.

100
00:06:08,289 --> 00:06:09,179
We have favor.

101
00:06:09,439 --> 00:06:13,219
We matter to Beijing." And every
government that received a panda

102
00:06:13,649 --> 00:06:17,239
and every citizen who visited
that zoo became psychologically

103
00:06:17,239 --> 00:06:21,519
invested in protecting China's image
because you protect what you love.

104
00:06:22,456 --> 00:06:24,796
And the panda was designed to be loved.

105
00:06:25,676 --> 00:06:29,096
But here's the mechanism most people miss.

106
00:06:29,796 --> 00:06:33,466
The panda is presented to you as
naturally endangered, struggling to

107
00:06:33,466 --> 00:06:38,366
survive in the wild, threatened by
habitat loss and human expansion.

108
00:06:38,716 --> 00:06:42,385
And here's a detail that
tells you everything.

109
00:06:42,786 --> 00:06:48,945
In twenty sixteen, the IUCN, the
International Union for Conservation

110
00:06:48,965 --> 00:06:53,825
of Nature, the official body that
sets these designations, quietly

111
00:06:53,825 --> 00:06:58,395
downgraded the giant panda from
endangered to merely vulnerable.

112
00:06:58,685 --> 00:07:03,755
The crisis narrative softened exactly
when it needed to, but by then,

113
00:07:04,196 --> 00:07:07,185
the infrastructure of emotional
investment was already built.

114
00:07:07,926 --> 00:07:13,736
This narrative is not false exactly, but
it's weaponized, because if the panda

115
00:07:13,736 --> 00:07:18,716
is endangered, then conservation efforts
become morally necessary, and conservation

116
00:07:18,735 --> 00:07:20,795
efforts require cooperation with China.

117
00:07:21,085 --> 00:07:25,795
And cooperation with China requires
maintaining stable relations with China.

118
00:07:26,176 --> 00:07:30,396
And maintaining stable relations with
China means your government cannot

119
00:07:30,396 --> 00:07:34,756
criticize China's human rights record,
cannot restrict trade, cannot apply

120
00:07:34,756 --> 00:07:36,415
pressure on geopolitical issues.

121
00:07:36,605 --> 00:07:39,075
The panda becomes a moral shield.

122
00:07:39,465 --> 00:07:42,575
China gets to do what it wants, and
Western governments get to tell their

123
00:07:42,575 --> 00:07:44,515
citizens they're saving the pandas.

124
00:07:45,215 --> 00:07:46,166
Everyone feels good.

125
00:07:46,806 --> 00:07:47,645
Everyone complies.

126
00:07:48,385 --> 00:07:49,406
The money proves it too.

127
00:07:49,685 --> 00:07:53,395
Modern panda loan agreements,
because China never gives pandas

128
00:07:53,395 --> 00:07:55,625
away anymore, they loan them.

129
00:07:55,755 --> 00:08:01,436
These loan agreement cost roughly one
million dollars per panda per year

130
00:08:01,785 --> 00:08:05,796
paid directly to Chinese government
affiliated conservation bodies.

131
00:08:05,946 --> 00:08:10,555
One million dollars per panda per year.

132
00:08:11,425 --> 00:08:15,065
The Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda
Breeding, the facility that manages

133
00:08:15,065 --> 00:08:19,275
most of these international placements,
operates under direct state oversight.

134
00:08:19,556 --> 00:08:22,045
Follow the money, and the
conservation narrative leads

135
00:08:22,045 --> 00:08:23,605
straight back to Beijing's treasury.

136
00:08:24,526 --> 00:08:26,166
The breeding numbers prove this further.

137
00:08:26,436 --> 00:08:30,866
From 1961 to today, China has
maintained such tight control over

138
00:08:30,866 --> 00:08:35,246
panda breeding data that independent
verification is nearly impossible.

139
00:08:35,526 --> 00:08:40,616
You're told there are roughly
1,800 pandas in the wild.

140
00:08:40,966 --> 00:08:42,465
But where did that number come from?

141
00:08:43,725 --> 00:08:46,125
Well, from Chinese government
surveys, of course.

142
00:08:46,415 --> 00:08:47,495
How were they conducted?

143
00:08:48,596 --> 00:08:49,386
Unclear.

144
00:08:50,036 --> 00:08:54,116
When was the last Western
independent census?

145
00:08:54,835 --> 00:08:56,015
Hmm, never.

146
00:08:56,915 --> 00:09:01,085
The world accepts China's word on panda
populations because rejecting that

147
00:09:01,085 --> 00:09:05,905
data would require rejecting the entire
conservation narrative, and rejecting

148
00:09:05,905 --> 00:09:09,945
the conservation narrative would
require admitting you were manipulated.

149
00:09:10,226 --> 00:09:12,335
Most people cannot do that.

150
00:09:12,675 --> 00:09:15,485
So the numbers stand unquestioned.

151
00:09:15,846 --> 00:09:20,565
And then notice what happens when
you do question the narrative.

152
00:09:21,225 --> 00:09:22,465
You're not labeled a skeptic.

153
00:09:22,785 --> 00:09:24,896
Nope, you're labeled cruel.

154
00:09:25,155 --> 00:09:27,055
You're told you don't care
about endangered species.

155
00:09:27,276 --> 00:09:29,705
You're made to feel morally wrong.

156
00:09:30,395 --> 00:09:31,375
This is the trap.

157
00:09:31,735 --> 00:09:35,805
The panda narrative weaponizes
compassion against critical thinking.

158
00:09:36,005 --> 00:09:40,446
It makes you feel guilty for asking
questions, because in asking, "How

159
00:09:40,456 --> 00:09:45,975
do we know these numbers are real?"
You're implicitly asking, "Do I care

160
00:09:45,985 --> 00:09:51,185
more about pandas or about geopolitical
manipulation?" And because the panda

161
00:09:51,185 --> 00:09:54,585
is so cute, because you've been
trained since childhood to love the

162
00:09:54,585 --> 00:09:56,985
panda, you of course choose the panda.

163
00:09:57,246 --> 00:09:58,966
You choose to believe.

164
00:09:59,405 --> 00:10:05,627
The doubt dissolves And once
again, the system persists.

165
00:10:06,548 --> 00:10:08,358
But wait, we are not done yet.

166
00:10:08,788 --> 00:10:09,617
It gets darker.

167
00:10:10,497 --> 00:10:14,818
Because the panda's role in geopolitics
didn't end with initial rapprochement.

168
00:10:15,288 --> 00:10:15,777
No, no.

169
00:10:16,397 --> 00:10:17,517
It evolved.

170
00:10:18,168 --> 00:10:21,617
As China's economic power grew
and as projects like the Belt and

171
00:10:21,617 --> 00:10:25,218
Road Initiative extended Beijing's
reach across dozens of nations, the

172
00:10:25,218 --> 00:10:26,627
panda narrative shifted with it.

173
00:10:26,918 --> 00:10:30,407
It stopped being about opening
dialogue and started being about

174
00:10:30,408 --> 00:10:33,367
maintenance, about, um, control.

175
00:10:33,727 --> 00:10:39,667
Every time a Western nation criticized
China on labor practices, on Tibet,

176
00:10:39,987 --> 00:10:44,007
on intellectual property theft, China
reminded the world that they controlled

177
00:10:44,007 --> 00:10:49,327
the pandas, that the pandas lived in
China, that pandas could be removed,

178
00:10:49,678 --> 00:10:54,957
breeding programs could be shut
down, and access could be revoked.

179
00:10:55,527 --> 00:10:58,777
You see this played out in the trade
agreements, the sudden availability

180
00:10:58,777 --> 00:11:03,217
of pandas to favorable nations, the
sudden unavailability to critical ones.

181
00:11:03,537 --> 00:11:08,567
The panda is a carrot and a stick all
wrapped up in black and white fur and

182
00:11:08,567 --> 00:11:12,047
conveniently CITES, the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered

183
00:11:12,047 --> 00:11:16,207
Species, requires all panda transfers to
go through Chinese government approval.

184
00:11:17,088 --> 00:11:21,807
The regulatory framework itself
became part of the control structure.

185
00:11:22,677 --> 00:11:28,278
The deepest irony is this: the panda
is not even uniquely endangered.

186
00:11:28,577 --> 00:11:32,058
The giant panda is not more threatened
than hundreds of other species.

187
00:11:32,367 --> 00:11:36,897
The Bengal tiger, the Javan
rhino, the Arabian oryx, many of

188
00:11:36,897 --> 00:11:41,137
these face far greater extinction
risk, but they don't have the

189
00:11:41,147 --> 00:11:42,967
geopolitical utility of the panda.

190
00:11:43,157 --> 00:11:46,368
They don't live in a nation the
West needed to negotiate with, so

191
00:11:46,617 --> 00:11:48,317
they don't receive the funding.

192
00:11:48,607 --> 00:11:50,188
They don't receive the media coverage.

193
00:11:50,547 --> 00:11:54,517
They don't receive the breeding programs
and the international cooperation.

194
00:11:54,817 --> 00:11:58,657
The panda gets all of those things,
not because it's the most endangered,

195
00:11:58,657 --> 00:12:00,707
but because it's the most useful.

196
00:12:01,527 --> 00:12:02,807
Its rarity is its power.

197
00:12:02,817 --> 00:12:07,317
Its adorability is its camouflage, and
you were supposed to never notice the

198
00:12:07,317 --> 00:12:13,093
difference What's particularly genius
about this disinformation campaign

199
00:12:13,274 --> 00:12:15,144
is that it's self-perpetuating.

200
00:12:15,694 --> 00:12:19,184
Even now, even with this knowledge,
even knowing that the panda

201
00:12:19,184 --> 00:12:23,483
narrative serves geopolitical
interests, you still love pandas.

202
00:12:23,634 --> 00:12:28,213
You still want them to survive, and
that's the trap closing right before

203
00:12:28,214 --> 00:12:32,653
your eyes because your desire to
save the panda makes you complicit

204
00:12:32,794 --> 00:12:34,763
in everything the panda represents.

205
00:12:34,983 --> 00:12:38,353
You become invested in maintaining
good relations with China so

206
00:12:38,353 --> 00:12:40,043
that panda programs continue.

207
00:12:40,944 --> 00:12:46,173
Your compassion has been weaponized,
your morality has been colonized, and the

208
00:12:46,183 --> 00:12:49,334
system grows stronger because you care.

209
00:12:50,183 --> 00:12:54,763
So now, the question you have to sit
with, and there is no comfortable answer,

210
00:12:54,764 --> 00:12:59,323
is this: If you learn tomorrow that
pandas were not actually endangered,

211
00:12:59,603 --> 00:13:03,424
that populations were stable, that the
whole crisis narrative was fabricated

212
00:13:03,584 --> 00:13:07,753
to serve diplomatic objectives, would
you feel relieved or devastated?

213
00:13:08,634 --> 00:13:13,574
Because your honest answer to that
question reveals how completely

214
00:13:13,604 --> 00:13:14,953
the manipulation has worked.

215
00:13:15,253 --> 00:13:19,773
If you feel devastated, if the idea
of a stable panda population would

216
00:13:19,773 --> 00:13:23,793
somehow feel like a betrayal, then
you've been perfectly programmed.

217
00:13:24,113 --> 00:13:25,323
The system has won.

218
00:13:25,644 --> 00:13:29,193
Your emotional investment has become
indistinguishable from the truth.

219
00:13:29,913 --> 00:13:33,924
This is the underhanded mechanism
of modern disinformation.

220
00:13:34,553 --> 00:13:36,183
It doesn't spread through lies alone.

221
00:13:36,674 --> 00:13:40,803
It spreads through beautiful lies,
through narratives that make you feel

222
00:13:40,814 --> 00:13:46,514
good about believing them, that make you
feel moral, that make you feel like you're

223
00:13:46,514 --> 00:13:48,463
part of something larger than yourself.

224
00:13:48,823 --> 00:13:50,553
The panda narrative does all three.

225
00:13:50,693 --> 00:13:54,633
It tells you that you care, that
you're helping, that your love

226
00:13:54,634 --> 00:13:57,804
for a creature translates into
meaningful action, and maybe it does.

227
00:13:57,804 --> 00:13:59,313
Maybe pandas do benefit.

228
00:13:59,564 --> 00:14:02,453
But you'll never know for certain
because you've been trained

229
00:14:02,503 --> 00:14:04,283
to never ask the question.

230
00:14:04,884 --> 00:14:07,163
The final trap is the
one you're in right now.

231
00:14:07,753 --> 00:14:10,603
Having listened to this,
you now have three options.

232
00:14:11,283 --> 00:14:15,053
You can dismiss it entirely and
return to loving pandas without doubt.

233
00:14:15,424 --> 00:14:18,923
You can accept it fully and become
paralyzed by the knowledge that your

234
00:14:18,924 --> 00:14:23,194
compassion has been manipulated, or you
can live in the middle, knowing the truth,

235
00:14:23,403 --> 00:14:27,333
still caring about pandas, but never
quite certain which part of your caring

236
00:14:27,334 --> 00:14:29,904
is genuine and which part is programmed.

237
00:14:30,814 --> 00:14:32,494
Most people choose the third option.

238
00:14:32,683 --> 00:14:36,603
Most people choose to live with the
uncertainty because certainty is

239
00:14:36,603 --> 00:14:40,003
too painful, and that uncertainty,
that cognitive dissonance,

240
00:14:40,224 --> 00:14:41,774
that's the actual victory.

241
00:14:42,073 --> 00:14:46,664
Not the panda, not the diplomacy,
but your permanent doubt.

242
00:14:47,564 --> 00:14:50,443
But hey, the panda is still adorably cute.

243
00:14:50,683 --> 00:14:52,963
So at least that part was never a lie.

244
00:14:54,073 --> 00:14:54,513
Right?

245
00:14:55,694 --> 00:14:57,743
This has been Some Unapproved Thinking.

246
00:14:58,584 --> 00:14:59,843
Tracy out.

247
00:15:00,204 --> 00:15:03,074
If this story didn't sit
right with you, good.

248
00:15:03,554 --> 00:15:04,973
You're not here to be comforted.

249
00:15:05,413 --> 00:15:07,914
You're here to see what others overlook.

250
00:15:08,324 --> 00:15:09,944
Thanks for exploring Some Unapproved

251
00:15:13,373 --> 00:15:13,934
Thinking.

252
00:15:14,063 --> 00:15:14,774
Learn more at someunapprovedthinking.com.

253
00:15:15,284 --> 00:15:17,103
New episodes drop weekly.

254
00:15:17,544 --> 00:15:22,993
Subscribe, share, and keep questioning
because the pattern's still playing

255
00:15:22,993 --> 00:15:25,733
out, and next time, we're going deeper